[rfc-i] Pre-qualifying errata [was Re: Errata proposal]

Peter Koch pk at DENIC.DE
Tue Aug 21 10:32:52 PDT 2012


On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:20:08AM -0700, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:

> Again, the problem I have is to track the errata for each RFC I implement - I
> have to read them, understand them and decide if they apply to my
> implementation or not.  So spurious errata create more work for me.

so your real problem is that pending errata aren't dealt with
quick (or rigid) enough?

-Peter


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list