[rfc-i] Pre-qualifying errata [was Re: Errata proposal]

Peter Koch pk at DENIC.DE
Tue Aug 21 10:32:52 PDT 2012

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:20:08AM -0700, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:

> Again, the problem I have is to track the errata for each RFC I implement - I
> have to read them, understand them and decide if they apply to my
> implementation or not.  So spurious errata create more work for me.

so your real problem is that pending errata aren't dealt with
quick (or rigid) enough?


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list