[rfc-i] rfcformat session: xml2rfc implementations

Tim Bray tbray at textuality.com
Fri Aug 17 06:06:15 PDT 2012


First I've heard of the new Python implementation; link please?

As for XSLT, I'm sure yours is excellent, but that's something of a niche
skill; and becoming more so.

-T
On Aug 17, 2012 5:06 AM, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I recently watched the session from the Vancouver meeting, and I have one
> comment wrt what Tim Bray said:
>
> - there three, not two, independent implementations (the original TCL
> code, my XSLT code, plus the new Python implementation).
>
> - I do agree that the TCL code is hard to maintain (although I wouldn't
> say "unmaintainable"), but it's certainly not the case for the XSLT variant
> (I would know, wouldn't I-).
>
> Best regards, Julian
> ______________________________**_________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/**mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest<https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/attachments/20120817/71ce7244/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list