[rfc-i] support for tables (from RFC 5892)
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Tue Apr 24 22:54:35 PDT 2012
On 2012-04-25 02:53, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote:
> On 2012/04/25 7:13, Larry Masinter wrote:
>> This is also a good example of "Better support for tables". While
>> XML2RFC supports tables, the ASCII output is hard to read.
> The other problem with the XML2RFC table support is that it is very
> different from HTML tables. This should be fixed.
> Regards, Martin.
Back when this was added to xml2rfc, there was a big argument about the
syntax. (I lost.)
That being said, a concern is that if we add too much complexity, it
will become quite hard to generate anything *but* HTML.
Best regards, Julian
More information about the rfc-interest