[rfc-i] Problems and requirements for RFC Format
sm at resistor.net
Sun Apr 22 11:14:21 PDT 2012
At 09:55 22-04-2012, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>True, but irrelevant. The RFC Editor does not get to set the I-D
>format. It's not clear who does, but there's no need to push a
>constitutional issue; if the RFC Editor changes the format for RFCs,
>one hopes that the correct I* body will change the format for I-Ds.
There isn't really an I-D format. There are the guidelines to
authors of I-Ds ( http://www.ietf.org/ietf-ftp/1id-guidelines.html ).
It seems that nobody polices I-Ds. It might be futile anyway unless
you want to take action in cases where someone obfuscates information
relating to authorship. The only problem is IPR.
More information about the rfc-interest