[rfc-i] Fwd: Re: Informational RFC to be: <draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-10.txt>
olaf at NLnetLabs.nl
Wed Sep 28 06:55:38 PDT 2011
On Sep 27, 2011, at 6:30 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
> As such, I think that non-IETF streams MUST NOT:
> 1. Claim to follow RFC 2026 (The Internet Standards Process -- Revision 3)
> 2. Claim to conform to RFC 2119 (Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels)
> 3. Have a title that asserts that the document is a standard or BCP
3 short remarks:
1. RFC5741 tries to address the practical issues of inter stream confusion.
2. -1 on pont 2 (2119 is of great benefit for any specifications, in and outside the (greater) IETF.
3. Point 3 is about fairness in advertisement and also applies to IETF stream documents that are not a standard or BCP (also a motivation for RFC5741)
Olaf M. Kolkman NLnet Labs
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 2210 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the rfc-interest