[rfc-i] Fwd: Re: Informational RFC to be: <draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-10.txt>
johnl at taugh.com
Tue Sep 27 11:52:11 PDT 2011
>This document is a summary of best practices for BL management. The
>authors talked to people who run BLs to find out what works and
>summarized what they found out. You know, research, since it's from
>an RG. The title accurately describes what it is.
>There's a few places it uses the term BCP which is a mistake. I added
>a note to the RFC Ed to fix them. I don't see what the problem is
>with 2026 lanaguage -- if you want to follow the practices it
>describes, that's how you do it.
Sorry, I mean 2119 language. All IRTF RFCs have boilerplate inserted
by the RFC Ed that says that they're IRTF documents. See RFC 5741.
PS: How come you didn't bring this up when we were reviewing this doc
in the ASRG?
More information about the rfc-interest