[rfc-i] Fwd: Re: Informational RFC to be: <draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-10.txt>
touch at isi.edu
Tue Sep 27 09:38:34 PDT 2011
On 9/27/2011 9:30 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
> As such, I think that non-IETF streams MUST NOT:
> 1. Claim to follow RFC 2026 (The Internet Standards Process -- Revision 3)
> 2. Claim to conform to RFC 2119 (Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
> Requirement Levels)
I disagree; tTspecifications too.
> 3. Have a title that asserts that the document is a standard or BCP
I think "experimental standard" is OK in a title too.
More information about the rfc-interest