[rfc-i] I-D Action:draft-iab-rfc-editor-model-v2-00.txt

Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com
Sun Mar 20 16:10:09 PDT 2011

On 2011-03-21 11:57, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
> Thanks Brian.
> Would it suffice to use your suggesting wording, and adding something
> like. "Currently, this is aligns with the IAB Program structure."?  (I
> believe grammatically I am just supposed to leave a ? in the quots, but
> that hurts too much.)

Yes, that's fine.


> With regard to ISEB, thanks for the suggestion for repair.  Also thanks
> for catching the remaining RSAG reference.
> I will leave the question of the vision text for others to debate.
> Joel
> On 3/20/2011 6:29 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I think this is going in the right direction. The following comments are
>> essentially editorial, with perhaps one exception:
> ...
>>> 4.1.1.  RSOC composition
>>>     The RSOC will operate as a Program of the IAB, with the IAB
>>> retaining
>>>     final responsibility.  The IAB will delegate authority and
>>>     responsibility to the RSOC as appropriate and as RSOC and RSE
>>>     relationships evolve.  Like other IAB Programs, the RSOC will
>>> include
>>>     people who are not current IAB members.
>> I still believe it is a mistake to tie this to the current IAB's notion
>> of "Programs". The text can easily be adjusted in a way that makes it
>> perennial:
> ...

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list