[rfc-i] Signing RFCs
touch at isi.edu
Wed Jun 29 09:57:15 PDT 2011
On 6/29/2011 9:52 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On Jun 29, 2011, at 9:39 AM, Joe Touch wrote:
>> When a person says "I copied X into a backup near date Z", a good lawyer would ask "how do you know *this* document was part of that process"? That's why notary organizations (that's what we're asking for) usually have very detailed procedures; those procedures are frequently the focus of their testimony.
> If the person answers "I know it because that's what I usually do", there isn't really much a good lawyer can demand from them. No one is demanding that the IETF become a notary organization, even though a very small number of parties in legal disputes would love it if we were. We're not, and they can just live with it.
>> Now that I raise the point, why not foist this off to another organization that already supports this? e.g.:
> Would "real cost with no provable value" suffice as an answer?
It depends on whether the answer also means that signing our own is
"nonzero cost with no provable value" too.
I'd be glad to wait for IANA to figure this out with a lawyer, rather
than us *assuming* that signatures actually help.
More information about the rfc-interest