[rfc-i] List verified errata in References

Mykyta Yevstifeyev evnikita2 at gmail.com
Tue Jun 28 22:10:54 PDT 2011


Current references format does not give information about any verified 
errata for the given document.  Don't you think having, eg.

> Hethmon, P., "Extensions to FTP", RFC 3659, March 2007.  Ammended by RFC Erratum Report 899 and RFC Erratum Report 900.

> Postel, J., "Transmission Control Protocol", STD 7, RFC 793, September 1981.  Ammended by RFC Erratum Report 572,RFC Erratum Report 573,RFC Erratum Report 574,
> RFC Erratum Report 575,RFC Erratum Report 700,RFC Erratum Report 701, andRFC Erratum Report 1283.
will be clearer?  This is also as other SDOs do with their documents.  
Any thoughts?

Mykyta Yevstifeyev

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list