[rfc-i] The "executive management" conundrum
paul.hoffman at vpnc.org
Tue Jul 19 09:54:09 PDT 2011
On Jul 19, 2011, at 9:44 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
> On 7/19/2011 8:59 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> Ah! Thanks. I thought Dave was referring to a separate document, given that
>> the profile you refer to is mostly a rewrite of section 2.1.6 of the draft.
> It is actually useful to hear that an independent set of eyes assesses it as a straightforward derivation, since an inherent concern with such a separate document is that it might be seen as diverging from the underlying material.
I did not say "a straightforward derivation": I said "a rewrite". It does diverge (and sounds like it will diverge more) in a confusing fashion.
Simple questions: Why are the two different? Will they be made the same soon?
More information about the rfc-interest