[rfc-i] The "executive management" conundrum
dhc at dcrocker.net
Tue Jul 19 09:44:17 PDT 2011
On 7/19/2011 8:59 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Ah! Thanks. I thought Dave was referring to a separate document, given that
> the profile you refer to is mostly a rewrite of section 2.1.6 of the draft.
It is actually useful to hear that an independent set of eyes assesses it as a
straightforward derivation, since an inherent concern with such a separate
document is that it might be seen as diverging from the underlying material.
More information about the rfc-interest