[rfc-i] I-D Action: draft-iab-rfc-editor-model-v2-02.txt

Dave Crocker dhc at dcrocker.net
Mon Jul 18 18:17:46 PDT 2011


+1

d/
--
Dave Crocker
bbiw.net

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden at gmail.com> wrote:

I was asked to clarify my +1 to Brian's email. I still support the change to remove "executive management" and think the rest of the document is fine to go forward. 

Bob

On Jul 18, 2011, at 11:49 AM, Bob Hinden wrote:

> 
> On Jul 17, 2011, at 7:10 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I finally made time to read this entire draft while waiting for the
>> dentist this morning.
>> 
>> I've also read (most of) the recent discussion, but IMHO the draft
>> as it is would be just fine. I don't see further tuning as cost-effective.
> 
> +1
> 
> Bob
> 
> 
>> 
>> Nit: surely it should include an Obsoletes: 5620 (if approved) header?
>> 
>> Regards
>> Brian Carpenter
>>_____________________________________________

>> rfc-interest mailing list
>> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
> 

_____________________________________________

rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/attachments/20110718/7d0f8c2b/attachment.html>


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list