[rfc-i] I-D Action: draft-iab-rfc-editor-model-v2-02.txt
bob.hinden at gmail.com
Mon Jul 18 11:27:33 PDT 2011
I was asked to clarify my +1 to Brian's email. I still support the change to remove "executive management" and think the rest of the document is fine to go forward.
On Jul 18, 2011, at 11:49 AM, Bob Hinden wrote:
> On Jul 17, 2011, at 7:10 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> I finally made time to read this entire draft while waiting for the
>> dentist this morning.
>> I've also read (most of) the recent discussion, but IMHO the draft
>> as it is would be just fine. I don't see further tuning as cost-effective.
>> Nit: surely it should include an Obsoletes: 5620 (if approved) header?
>> Brian Carpenter
>> rfc-interest mailing list
>> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
More information about the rfc-interest