[rfc-i] draft-iab-rfc-editor-model-v2-02 - policy authority
olaf at NLnetLabs.nl
Wed Jul 13 11:38:01 PDT 2011
On Jul 13, 2011, at 7:19 PM, RJ Atkinson wrote:
> With respect to the specific <suggestion> bracketed text quoted above,
> the word "may" towards the end of the 1st paragraph is problematic.
> I believe that all of the groups listed after the "may" are necessarily
> materially interested groups, while using "may" sounds as if they
> might not be materially interested.
While I did try to express that for some matters the set of groups might be slightly different than others, I understand that the two groups given as example are more often included than not.
> So I would propose to rewrite the the 1st paragraph along these lines,
> with a primary objective to have more clear and specific wording
> for a very inclusive definition of "Internet community":
> All decisions are to be made in the overall interest
> of the broader Internet community. The RSE is responsible
> for identifying materially concerned interest groups within the
> Internet community and reach out to them. Those interest
> groups include at least the IETF community, the IRTF community,
> the network research community, and the network operations community.
> Other interest groups might also be materially interested.
WFM; although I would like to express that the reach-out bit is normative and the enumeration is informative. Not sure how to do that.
Olaf M. Kolkman NLnet Labs
More information about the rfc-interest