[rfc-i] ultimate authority
sm at resistor.net
Thu Jul 7 11:22:08 PDT 2011
At 07:44 07-07-2011, Dave CROCKER wrote:
>I don't see that a recall is automatically required.
>For reference, this authority model already exists formally within the IETF.
>In spite of working group and even community rough consensus, to
>approve a specification, an Area Director has the authority to block
>approval with a Discuss. While pressure can
If I am not mistaken, the IAB uses the word "responsibility" whereas
"authority" is commonly used in discussions relating to the IESG.
Quoting a sentence  posted by Olaf:
"I wish the chair who is subject to this a lot of wisdom."
More information about the rfc-interest