[rfc-i] Request for Review - draft-yevstifeyev-genarea-historic-01

Bob Hinden bob.hinden at gmail.com
Sun Jan 30 09:19:20 PST 2011


On Jan 29, 2011, at 11:34 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> Hi Mykyta,
> 
> In a few words, I don't consider that we have a problem
> here that is significant enough to need fixing. There are
> many, many problems in RFC 2026 which are much more important
> and that the community has decided to ignore.

+1

Bob


> 
> If you want more details on my opinions on this, see
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-carpenter-rfc2026-practice-00.txt
> and
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-carpenter-rfc2026-changes-02.txt
> 
> (This includes a very minor change to the text about Historic RFCs,
> which I believe is sufficient to align it with reality.)
> 
> For a more robust version of my opinions, see
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-carpenter-rfc2026-critique-00.txt
> 
> Regards
>   Brian Carpenter
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest



More information about the rfc-interest mailing list