[rfc-i] RFC Style guide
stpeter at stpeter.im
Thu Jan 27 10:14:43 PST 2011
On 1/19/11 3:56 PM, SM wrote:
> At 12:06 19-01-11, Glenn Kowack wrote:
>> Publishing the Style Guide as an RFC is an excellent idea. I'd like to
>> see a
>> discussion about that here, starting with:
>> - why should the Style Guide be an RFC?
>> - are there any reasons why the Style Guide should not be?
> If I recall correctly, one of arguments against publication is that
> there is a high cost to updating such a RFC.
> If the Style Guide is published as a RFC:
> (a) it gets wide dissemination
> (b) there is a stable reference
> (c) rfc2223bis doesn't need to be work in progress
> for another six years
> (d) Authors can be advised to read a RFC to understand
> how to write a RFC
Those all sound like good things to me!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 6105 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the rfc-interest