[rfc-i] Discussion about Committees and RSE models
ole at cisco.com
Mon Jan 17 17:33:38 PST 2011
I have to agree with you. I think the person who eventually gets the
RSE job would be expected to have a certain amount of "vision" and
some ideas for improvements to the way we do things, and certainly be
"in the driver's seat". But it's also clear that a number of changes
would require not only "committee buy-in" but also community
agreement. I'll mention the publications format (ASCII, PDF, e-Pub)
just as an example. It might not seem as big deal to those not
familiar to our processes, but I am sure that a unilateral decision on
the part of the RSE would have "major implications".
Speaking as someone involved in publishing, I really appreciate the
value of a group of advisors that I can turn to for all kinds of
advise, but it's also clear that there are times when I have to
make decisions without them, or turn to somebody else entirely.
I suspect there are, collectively, enough experts in this community
that the RSE wouldn't normally have to "wait for an answer" very long.
I don't have a strong opinion that one model is much better than
another, perhaps we simply have to try one and see how it goes. This
might mean getting a volunteer to do the job for a while or perhaps
using a contractor who can accept a 6 month to 12 month term.
I am still not sure where and how to find such a person...
Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor and Publisher, The Internet Protocol Journal
Tel: +1 408-527-8972 Mobile: +1 415-370-4628
E-mail: ole at cisco.com URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011, Bob Hinden wrote:
> I have read several comments on RSE model stating that committees
> can do anything right, make bad decisions, can't be trusted, and are
> guaranteed to not have the required expertise.
> I am confused by this in the IETF context as everything is done by
> committees. Working groups are committees, the IESG is a committee,
> the IAB is a committee, the IAOC is a committee, the Nomcom is a
> committee, the ISOC board of trustees is a committee, directorates
> are committees, etc. I don't claim that any of this is perfect, but
> I am confused by the statements that committees relating to the RSE
> model won't work, when they appear to work in other areas of the
> I understand why a committee needs to have the right expertise to
> work, but I don't understand the unsubstantiated claim that they are
> bound to fail. If we don't put the right set of people on the
> committee it will fail, but that also true for hiring an RSE. If we
> don't hire the right person with the right capabilities, then that
> won't work either. But that's not a reason to not hire an RSE.
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
More information about the rfc-interest