[rfc-i] The proper role of an RSE
paul.hoffman at vpnc.org
Fri Jan 7 13:47:21 PST 2011
On 1/7/11 1:32 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> So, to be legalistic, there's no obligation on the RSAG to report
> directly to the IAB or in any way to the community.
Correct, and nor was an obligation implied by my note. I thought asking
for input from individuals who had a lot of experience that the rest of
us did not was a reasonable thing.
> And, by the way,
> I think we are still the "interim RSAG" as described at the end of
> section 4.1.2 of 5620, since we still have a transitional RSE.
> In any case - IMHO it is quite correct that there is no identified
> consensus of the RSAG; we've been advising Glenn on successive drafts,
> but there has been no attempt to form a consensus. That's often the
> nature of an advisory group.
Certainly. Fortunately, such nature does not prevent any of you from
having opinions about what you have seen over the past many years.
More information about the rfc-interest