[rfc-i] Possible new text re I-Ds [RFC citations committee I-D issued]
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Sat Feb 12 08:04:04 PST 2011
On 12.02.2011 16:56, Scott O. Bradner wrote:
>> How do you get to the bit about "specific versions"?
> because 2026 permits references to "work in process" (i.e., an ID without
> using the name& version number that identify a specific version)
How does adding the number change the state of the ID? It's still "work
in progress" (or a "working draft").
Best regards, Julian
More information about the rfc-interest