[rfc-i] Possible new text re I-Ds [RFC citations committee I-D issued]

[Julian Reschke]

On 12.02.2011 16:56, Scott O. Bradner wrote:
>> How do you get to the bit about "specific versions"?
>
> because 2026 permits references to "work in process" (i.e., an ID without
> using the name&  version number that identify a specific version)

How does adding the number change the state of the ID? It's still "work 
in progress" (or a "working draft").

Best regards, Julian