[rfc-i] RFC citations committee I-D issued
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Fri Feb 11 08:15:53 PST 2011
On 11.02.2011 17:01, RJ Atkinson wrote:
> Earlier, Julien Reschke wrote:
>> What we SHOULD recommend is that the ID name SHOULD be included, and
>> the full data (as opposed to Year/Month) MAY be included.
> (NOTE: From discussion elsewhere, and the broader context above,
> I believe "full data" above is a typo, and that "full date" was
> what was actually meant. :-)
> As near as I can tell, all modern I-Ds include day, month,
> and year.
> So I believe the entire *available* date always MUST be included,
> both for I-Ds and RFCs. This recognises that for some RFCs
> the "available date" will be day+month+year and for other RFCs
> that will be simply month+year.
So which date are you referring to? Date of submission? Date of
publication? Or the date inside the I-D? All of these can be different;
in particular the latter can be totally off.
Best regards, Julian
More information about the rfc-interest