[rfc-i] RFCs and IPRs
bob.hinden at gmail.com
Fri Oct 15 12:55:51 PDT 2010
On Oct 15, 2010, at 12:34 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
> On 10/15/2010 3:04 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> I don't think it would be appropriate. IPR disclosure is only
>> required for IETF documents, not for RFCs in general. It would
>> be useful to have a note about this on the search page, perhaps.
> If there are associated IPR statements, they should be disclosed, IMO.
> Over at the IETF, the tools display of RFCs now highlights the presence of errata, if there is/are any. That same approach to contingent display sounds like the right model for IPR.
The tools pages currently include a link to relevant IPR. For example:
More information about the rfc-interest