[rfc-i] RFCs and IPRs

Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com
Fri Oct 15 12:47:46 PDT 2010

On 2010-10-16 08:34, Dave CROCKER wrote:
> On 10/15/2010 3:04 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> I don't think it would be appropriate. IPR disclosure is only
>> required for IETF documents, not for RFCs in general. It would
>> be useful to have a note about this on the search page, perhaps.
> If there are associated IPR statements, they should be disclosed, IMO.

No objection to one bit, and a pointer to http://www.ietf.org/ipr/

My objection is to replicating the IETF IPR information at rfc-editor.org


> Over at the IETF, the tools display of RFCs now highlights the presence
> of errata, if there is/are any.  That same approach to contingent
> display sounds like the right model for IPR.
> d/

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list