[rfc-i] RFCs and IPRs

Dave CROCKER dhc2 at dcrocker.net
Fri Oct 15 12:34:59 PDT 2010



On 10/15/2010 3:04 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> I don't think it would be appropriate. IPR disclosure is only
> required for IETF documents, not for RFCs in general. It would
> be useful to have a note about this on the search page, perhaps.


If there are associated IPR statements, they should be disclosed, IMO.

Over at the IETF, the tools display of RFCs now highlights the presence of 
errata, if there is/are any.  That same approach to contingent display sounds 
like the right model for IPR.

d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list