[rfc-i] RFCs and IPRs
dhc2 at dcrocker.net
Fri Oct 15 12:34:59 PDT 2010
On 10/15/2010 3:04 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> I don't think it would be appropriate. IPR disclosure is only
> required for IETF documents, not for RFCs in general. It would
> be useful to have a note about this on the search page, perhaps.
If there are associated IPR statements, they should be disclosed, IMO.
Over at the IETF, the tools display of RFCs now highlights the presence of
errata, if there is/are any. That same approach to contingent display sounds
like the right model for IPR.
More information about the rfc-interest