[rfc-i] new draft summarizing updated Transitional RFC Editor recommendations now available

Andrew Sullivan ajs at shinkuro.com
Mon Nov 29 12:44:09 PST 2010


On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 09:38:49AM +1300, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> 
> That's why my preference after a bit more thought is simply to drop the RSAG
> as a formally defined body, but (as I think Dave Crocker said) ensure that
> there is no exclusionary language to prevent the RSE taking on advisors.

Once I understood what was going on, I support the new committee.  I
agree that the RSAG can just be dropped.  I also agree that the RSE
has to be able to have whatever advisors s/he wants.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at shinkuro.com
Shinkuro, Inc.


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list