[rfc-i] The scope of "Historic"
dhc2 at dcrocker.net
Mon Nov 29 09:29:40 PST 2010
On 11/29/2010 9:07 AM, Bob Hinden wrote:
> I was talking to some former BBN colleagues about publishing BBN report 1822 (Arpanet host to IMP interface) as an RFC. Assuming I can get permission from BBN, I was thinking this should be submitted as "Historic". How would this fit your definition?
Makes sense to me.
(For reference, when we published DKIM as Proposed, we simultaneously published
it's technical origin from Yahoo!, DomainKeys, as Historic. This made the
original spec available for reference but made clear that it ought not to be
More information about the rfc-interest