[rfc-i] The scope of "Historic"

[Dave CROCKER]

On 11/29/2010 9:07 AM, Bob Hinden wrote:
> I was talking to some former BBN colleagues about publishing BBN report 1822 (Arpanet host to IMP interface) as an RFC.  Assuming I can get permission from BBN, I was thinking this should be submitted as "Historic".  How would this fit your definition?

Makes sense to me.

(For reference, when we published DKIM as Proposed, we simultaneously published 
it's technical origin from Yahoo!, DomainKeys, as Historic.  This made the 
original spec available for reference but made clear that it ought not to be 
implemented further.)

d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net