[rfc-i] Overview document available

Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com
Sun Nov 7 17:28:02 PST 2010


On 2010-11-08 14:13, Bob Hinden wrote:
> Brian,
> 
>>> Having rigid restrictions on what
>>> can be published in that stream is a disservice to the Internet
>>> Community if we would like the stream to flourish.  There is already one
>>> IETF and we don't need another IETF-like stream.
>> Nobody is proposing to create such a thing. All that is proposed is
>> that the RFC Editor can continue to publish occasional RFCs that
>> are concerned with the RFC series itself. To me that is simple
>> common sense.
> 
> Can we come up with a way in the model for the RFC-Series editor to publish occasional RFCs relating to the RFC series without having to create an explicit stream?  
> 
> I wonder if creating a whole stream to " publish occasional RFCs that are concerned with the RFC series itself" is overkill.

I agree. So my statement above "the RFC Editor can continue to publish occasional RFCs that
are concerned with the RFC series itself" may be necessary and sufficient.

   Brian


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list