[rfc-i] Future interaction of the Datatracker and the RFC Editor's tracker
rpelletier at isoc.org
Wed Jun 30 05:48:58 PDT 2010
I will be sending a notice out about the IT projects underway, including yours.
Regrets if the lack thereof has caused some confusion.
On Jun 29, 2010, at 12:14 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> At 8:02 PM +1200 6/29/10, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>>> Quite true. As I said in my message, the drafts I listed are still being considered in the IETF, and their recommendations will be implemented in the future.
>> Actually, no. As far as the non-IETF streams are concerned, whether they are
>> implemented or not gets decided by the streams concerned, not by the IETF.
> Of course. Please note that I said "considered in the IETF", not "considered by the IETF".
>> So it seems like the the alt-streams draft needs to be formally reviewed by
>> each of the non-IETF streams. Somebody, for example the TRSE, needs to
>> make sure that happens.
> Immediately after the IAOC contracted me to write the draft, I have been in close contact with Olaf, Nevil, and Aaron. This is a project of the IAOC, not the TRSE. The project covers the states in the Internet Draft part of the Datatracker, not the RFC Editor's tracker. That's why I brought the issue to this list: when the Datatracker is updated, the RFC Editor's tracker should change.
> I will add a note in the -02 version of my draft to make it clear that this isn't a rogue proposal.
> --Paul Hoffman, Director
> --VPN Consortium
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
More information about the rfc-interest