[rfc-i] "canonical" URI for RFCs, BCPs

Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com
Thu Jan 28 12:05:02 PST 2010

On 2010-01-28 21:18, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> ...
>> Yes, that would be best, but then it would need to be direct, not a
>> URI to
>> a metadocument, which is where http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1
>> takes me.
>> Unfortunately http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc1 and
>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1
>> are both 404.
>> ...
> Indeed. That's exactly I'd like to have changed.

I suggest making this into a formal request once the permanent
RSE is appointed.


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list