[rfc-i] "canonical" URI for RFCs, BCPs
Brian E Carpenter
brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com
Thu Jan 28 12:05:02 PST 2010
On 2010-01-28 21:18, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> Yes, that would be best, but then it would need to be direct, not a
>> URI to
>> a metadocument, which is where http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1
>> takes me.
>> Unfortunately http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc1 and
>> are both 404.
> Indeed. That's exactly I'd like to have changed.
I suggest making this into a formal request once the permanent
RSE is appointed.
More information about the rfc-interest