[rfc-i] "canonical" URI for RFCs, BCPs
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Thu Jan 28 00:18:53 PST 2010
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Yes, that would be best, but then it would need to be direct, not a URI to
> a metadocument, which is where http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1
> takes me.
> Unfortunately http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc1 and http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1
> are both 404.
Indeed. That's exactly I'd like to have changed.
More information about the rfc-interest