[rfc-i] "canonical" URI for RFCs, BCPs
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Wed Feb 10 05:06:35 PST 2010
Bob Braden wrote:
> No, the introduction of meta-pages was independent of RFC 5741, although
> they happened to coincide in time.
> This discussion suggests that the situation might have been clearer if
> the meta-pages were named /info/rfcxxxx.meta (you see, I am a believer
> in type suffixes.) Oh, well.
I though the prefix "/info/" made things sufficiently clear...
More information about the rfc-interest