[rfc-i] state of transition -- was: "canonical" URI for RFCs, BCPs

[Bob Braden]

Alfred ? wrote:
> At Wed, 27 Jan 2010 02:36:33 +0100, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> Paul Hoffman wrote:
>>> ...
>>> Note, however, /info/bcp[0-9]+ is not (yet) populated.  If the interim
>>> RSE (as compared to the transitional RSE...) wants to make that happen
>>> for BCP, FYI, and STD, that would be grand.
>>> ...
>> BTW, *is* there an interim RSE?
>>
>> BR, Julian
> 
> ... and, BTW #2, an interim ISE as well?
> 
> BR,
>   Alfred.
>

Guilty on both counts.  (I apologize to those in charge around here, who 
should have announced this some time ago, for upstaging them... but I 
figure people ought to have the bad news.)  (Or maybe I don't apologize)

ISOC is funding a fraction of my time to continue to perform the RSE and 
ISE functions until the incumbents for those positions are filled and 
ready to tango.

Bob Braden