[rfc-i] "canonical" URI for RFCs, BCPs

Tim Bray tbray at textuality.com
Mon Feb 1 12:24:48 PST 2010

On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:19 PM, John R Levine <johnl at taugh.com> wrote:

> Note that type negotiation doesn't do what you want; all of the Postscript
> RFCs have text stub versions, and if a web browser says it prefers text to
> postscript, it'll get the text.

Eek, really?  That's a bug in the configuration of the server.  It's
perfectly reasonable to decree that
the-one-and-only-representation-of-a-resource-shall-be-thus-and-so and
I believe that's what the IETF policy is, so the server should bloody
well ignore the Accept header, except to return 406 Not Acceptable if
the client says it won't accept text.

 - Tim

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list