[rfc-i] "canonical" URI for RFCs, BCPs
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Mon Feb 1 09:02:42 PST 2010
John R Levine wrote:
>> For the exceptions above, that should return the PS. For all
>> others, it should return the TXT.
> Honestly, that strikes me as being the absolute worst of all possible
> worlds. You have a URL that might return a text file, might return a
> Postcript file, and in the future might return something else. How is
> that useful to anyone?
It would be useful for anyone who wants to produce "the" canonical URI
for a given RFC -- this is what started the whole discussion.
Best regards, Julian
More information about the rfc-interest