[rfc-i] Proper way to include examples with yet-to-be-assigned values?

Paul Hoffman paul.hoffman at vpnc.org
Thu Aug 12 16:13:31 PDT 2010


At 3:34 PM -0700 8/12/10, Joe Touch wrote:
>Ultimately, you would get the numbers and you would put them in during one of the edit phases, or at least you'd be responsible for checking during AUTH48 anyway.

This entails making significant technical changes during AUTH48. That is unseemly, to say the least. Thus my questions about a better way to do it.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list