[rfc-i] Proper way to include examples with yet-to-be-assigned values?
paul.hoffman at vpnc.org
Thu Aug 12 15:28:00 PDT 2010
At 3:09 PM -0700 8/12/10, Joe Touch wrote:
>Having just done this, I used:
Sorry, I wasn't clear. We did "TBD" for the name of the new algorithm, but we had to include a number in our calculations, so we had to pick one.
And, to be less obscure, see section 6 of <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hoffman-dnssec-ecdsa-03>.
--Paul Hoffman, Director
More information about the rfc-interest