[rfc-i] Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Wed Nov 25 06:14:41 PST 2009
(removed ietf-discuss and xml2rfc mailing list from cc:)
RFC Editor wrote:
> Hi Julian,
> I went through version -08 of the headers-boilerplates document and
> attempted to put together all of the possible combinations of text for
> the "Status of This Memo." I believe the attached file is a complete
> list of these possibilities, based on the text in Section 3.
> Please note that I have updated the URLs to match that of the existing
> metadata pages that were created in response to this document
Good. I'm updating rfc2629.xslt accordingly.
> The RFC Editor hopes that the IAB will agree to update the URLs
> (throughout) and the text in Appendix A to reflect the appropriate
> text from the corresponding Stream/Status/Consensus in the attached
> file during the editing process.
> Please feel free to check the attached files, as manual error is
> Hope this is of some help! Thanks!
It is, and it should have been done earlier.
I just checked up to the 5th example:
> 5. IETF Historic w/ consensus
> Status of This Memo
> This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it
> is published for the historical record.
> This document defines a Historic Document for the Internet
> community. It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It
> has received public review and has been approved for publication by
> the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Not all
> documents approved by the IESG are candidate for any level of
> Internet Standards; see Section 2 of RFC XXXX.
> Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
> and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
Here, in the 2nd paragraph, the 2nd sentence ("This document is a
product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).") seems to be
I'll check the other ones time permitting...
More information about the rfc-interest