[rfc-i] "obsoleted by" in RFC 5143

Bob Braden braden at ISI.EDU
Thu Nov 19 12:20:31 PST 2009



Andrew G. Malis wrote:

> 5143, which was indeed obsoleted by 4842. We made that pretty clear in
> the abstract to 5143.

Yes, you did make it very clear in the Abstract to 5143.

Bob Braden



More information about the rfc-interest mailing list