[rfc-i] [IAB] Headers and Boilerplates is done.
touch at ISI.EDU
Thu Nov 19 10:27:36 PST 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Bob Braden wrote:
>> Let me rephrase:
>> My read of the original suggestion was that no consensus discussion
>> would occur - that this would be up to the authors/RFC Editor. Because
>> this is a substantive change, I disagree with that conclusion.
> WHAT is a substantive change? Adding the common abbreviations (e.g.,
> "IETF") to help outsiders to recognize the stream designation?s Adding
> the word "submission" to "Independent", which in fact brings it more
> into line with 4846? Calling these substantive would seem to me totally
> illogical, so I must assume you are referring to some other change as
> substantive. Please explain.
Adding the word "submission" to Independent, but not to IAB, IETF, or
That may seem illogical to you, but it's inconsistent and the
inconsistency is substantive to me.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the rfc-interest