[rfc-i] [IAB] Headers and Boilerplates is done.

Joe Touch touch at ISI.EDU
Thu Nov 19 10:27:36 PST 2009


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Bob Braden wrote:
> 
> 
>>
>> Let me rephrase:
>>
>> My read of the original suggestion was that no consensus discussion
>> would occur - that this would be up to the authors/RFC Editor. Because
>> this is a substantive change, I disagree with that conclusion.
> 
> WHAT is a substantive change?  Adding the common abbreviations (e.g.,
> "IETF") to help outsiders to recognize the stream designation?s  Adding
> the word "submission" to "Independent", which in fact brings it more
> into line with 4846?  Calling these substantive would seem to me totally
> illogical, so I must assume you are referring to some other change as
> substantive.  Please explain.

Adding the word "submission" to Independent, but not to IAB, IETF, or
other streams.

That may seem illogical to you, but it's inconsistent and the
inconsistency is substantive to me.

Joe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)

iEYEARECAAYFAksFjhcACgkQE5f5cImnZrtTCwCglhTp4TryK/5lOuFRAKrCg59C
6qUAoLU0j8zLsWyEop3tkWqG6UGTA4v4
=fFIy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list