[rfc-i] [IAB] Section Ordering in RFCs (Abstract Placement)

Joe Touch touch at ISI.EDU
Sat Jun 20 11:05:45 PDT 2009


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



John C Klensin wrote:
...
> I'd rather see progress.

That progress comes at and expense of maintainers of templates, authors,
etc.

Perhaps rather than tying the changes together, we can at least agree
that *all changes* take effect at most once per year, on a given date
(e.g., the first IETF of the year?).

That way change making can make progress at whatever pace is desired
while limiting its impact on the community.

Joe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAko9JPkACgkQE5f5cImnZrtSegCg4ZDOsw9iZlp/uNGyrFaf0p2g
JwMAoNBB+hWsbUJvqNAA4yz/SiU0Xtms
=8x2x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list