[rfc-i] I-D Boilerplate Question (not related to IPR, promised!)
touch at ISI.EDU
Sat Jan 31 10:54:48 PST 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Olaf Kolkman wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2009, at 7:24 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> Julian Reschke wrote:
>>> Joe Touch wrote:
>>>> I like recommending - but not requiring - the WG name. People print
>>>> these docs out, and it's useful to know what the context of the work
>>>> No harm if they don't follow it, though.
>>> Indeed (I just upgraded rfc2629.xslt to mirror xml2rfc's behavior).
>>> Do we have a recommendation for non-WG submissions?
> Sponsoring AD or Area?
Right; the phrases would be:
IETF XXXXX WG
IRTF XXXXX WG
IRTF XXXXX Area
IETF XXXXX Area
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the rfc-interest