[rfc-i] I-D Boilerplate Question (not related to IPR, promised!)

Joe Touch touch at ISI.EDU
Sat Jan 31 10:54:48 PST 2009


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Olaf Kolkman wrote:
> 
> On Jan 30, 2009, at 7:24 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
> 
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>>
>>
>> Julian Reschke wrote:
>>> Joe Touch wrote:
>>>> ...
>>>> I like recommending - but not requiring - the WG name. People print
>>>> these docs out, and it's useful to know what the context of the work
>>>> is.
>>>>
>>>> No harm if they don't follow it, though.
>>>> ...
>>>
>>> Indeed (I just upgraded rfc2629.xslt to mirror xml2rfc's behavior).
>>>
>>> Do we have a recommendation for non-WG submissions?
>>
>> Individual?
> 
> Sponsoring AD or Area?

Right; the phrases would be:

	IETF XXXXX WG
	IRTF XXXXX WG
	IRTF XXXXX Area
	IETF XXXXX Area
	IAB
	Individual

etc.

Joe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkmEnngACgkQE5f5cImnZruqwQCdEw2T8TBAif8mivnP5Jp4OB6g
/cIAoMmnxVp1bIi34MyAv2Fm2YNw21uI
=7Izl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list