[rfc-i] I-D Boilerplate Question (not related to IPR, promised!)
olaf at NLnetLabs.nl
Sat Jan 31 10:48:21 PST 2009
On Jan 30, 2009, at 7:24 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> Julian Reschke wrote:
>> Joe Touch wrote:
>>> I like recommending - but not requiring - the WG name. People print
>>> these docs out, and it's useful to know what the context of the
>>> work is.
>>> No harm if they don't follow it, though.
>> Indeed (I just upgraded rfc2629.xslt to mirror xml2rfc's behavior).
>> Do we have a recommendation for non-WG submissions?
Sponsoring AD or Area?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/attachments/20090131/4b6f374a/PGP.bin
More information about the rfc-interest