[rfc-i] I-D Boilerplate Question (not related to IPR, promised!)

[Olaf Kolkman]

On Jan 30, 2009, at 7:24 PM, Joe Touch wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> Julian Reschke wrote:
>> Joe Touch wrote:
>>> ...
>>> I like recommending - but not requiring - the WG name. People print
>>> these docs out, and it's useful to know what the context of the  
>>> work is.
>>>
>>> No harm if they don't follow it, though.
>>> ...
>>
>> Indeed (I just upgraded rfc2629.xslt to mirror xml2rfc's behavior).
>>
>> Do we have a recommendation for non-WG submissions?
>
> Individual?

Sponsoring AD or Area?

--Olaf
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/attachments/20090131/4b6f374a/PGP.bin