[rfc-i] I-D Boilerplate Question (not related to IPR, promised!)
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Fri Jan 30 00:26:58 PST 2009
Joe Touch wrote:
> I like recommending - but not requiring - the WG name. People print
> these docs out, and it's useful to know what the context of the work is.
> No harm if they don't follow it, though.
Indeed (I just upgraded rfc2629.xslt to mirror xml2rfc's behavior).
Do we have a recommendation for non-WG submissions?
More information about the rfc-interest