[rfc-i] Wrapup of Fwd: Comment on headers-and-boilerplates
touch at ISI.EDU
Tue Jan 13 18:10:19 PST 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Olaf Kolkman wrote:
> I read your other suggestions, but would like to stick to where we
> converged too... a fragile balance.
> However, you observed:
>> ++ note that the IETF documents are missing a phrase that refers to
>> section 2 of RFCXXXX.
> I can sympathize to the argument for symmetry... and I can come up with
> So to the current paragraph:
> For non-IETF stream documents a reference to <xref
> target="standards"/> of this RFC is added with the following
> sentence: "Documents approved for publication by the [stream
> approver -- currently, one of: "IAB", "IRSG", or "RFC
> Editor"] are not a candidate for any level of Internet
> Standard; see <xref target="standards"/> of RFCXXXX."
> I propose to add:
> For IETF stream documents a reference is added:
> Not all documents approved for publication by the IETF are
> candidate for any level of Internet Standards see
> <xref target="standards"/> of RFCXXXX."
I think you need a corresponding statement for the standards too, i.e.,
it is a standards-track doc, as explained in ...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the rfc-interest