[rfc-i] Fwd: Comment on headers-and-boilerplates

[Brian E Carpenter]

On 2009-01-09 06:23, Joe Touch wrote:

> These statements are (mutually exclusively) useful, however:
> 
> 	This document is an independent submission.
> 
> 	This document is a product of the IETF.
> 
> 	This document is a product of the IRTF.
> 
> 	This document is a product of the IAB.
> 
> Stating what a document IS is sufficient. Stating what it is NOT is what
> causes the concern, via the implication that being NOT from the IETF is
> some sort of stamp of "unchecked".

I agree, subject only to retaining the "not a standard of any kind"
phrase in *all* non-standards track RFCs.

     Brian