[rfc-i] Fwd: Comment on headers-and-boilerplates
Brian E Carpenter
brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com
Thu Jan 8 12:45:11 PST 2009
On 2009-01-09 06:23, Joe Touch wrote:
> These statements are (mutually exclusively) useful, however:
> This document is an independent submission.
> This document is a product of the IETF.
> This document is a product of the IRTF.
> This document is a product of the IAB.
> Stating what a document IS is sufficient. Stating what it is NOT is what
> causes the concern, via the implication that being NOT from the IETF is
> some sort of stamp of "unchecked".
I agree, subject only to retaining the "not a standard of any kind"
phrase in *all* non-standards track RFCs.
More information about the rfc-interest