[rfc-i] Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!
housley at vigilsec.com
Tue Dec 22 12:08:32 PST 2009
I agree with Birain's assessment. The RFC Editor can handle this
issue without delaying publication of the document.
At 02:39 PM 12/22/2009, Dave CROCKER wrote:
>This seems worth being a bit pedantic about, to make sure we all
>share the same
>understanding: I take your interpretation to mean that the RFC
>Editor can, on
>their own initiative, fix the problem(s) that Julan has raised and
>that it does
>not require changes to the about-to-be-published document.
>Is that correct? Do others agree? (I hope so.)
>On 12/22/2009 11:23 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> >> FWIW, the document allows the RFC editor some headway in
> maintaining the language in the style guide.
> > For now, there are indeed weasel words such as:
> > "However, this is not
> > intended to specify a single, static format. Details of formatting
> > are decided by the RFC Editor."
> > "These paragraphs will need to be
> > defined and maintained as part of RFC stream definitions. Initial
> > text, for current streams, is provided below."
> > I think this gives the RSE, in conjunction with the tools maintainers,
> > reasonable flexibility.
> Dave Crocker
> Brandenburg InternetWorking
>rfc-interest mailing list
>rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
More information about the rfc-interest