[rfc-i] Using LaTeX & BibTeX to cite RFCs

Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com
Fri Aug 28 13:42:15 PDT 2009


Without going into specifics, I think we have to consider what
will survive LaTeX processing with typical class files, and actually
appear in the published citation. In my experience, putting
something into its most logical container in a raw BibTeX file
doesn't always cause it to appear in the finished paper as one
would wish. For many publications in our area, the ACM or CCR
class files are common, and I would certainly want any
recommended BibTeX template to produce a good result with
those class files.


On 2009-08-29 04:06, Joe Touch wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
> RJ Atkinson wrote:
>> On  28 Aug 2009, at 11:37, Joe Touch wrote:
>>> The "publisher" is the ISOC, at least for the later RFCs. Even for  
>>> older
>>> RFCs that predate ISOC involvement, the ISOC is the basis for making
>>> them available (even the Independent stream) and is thus the publisher
>>> at least in a sort.
>>> I would never say the publisher was the RFC Editor - that's the  
>>> editor,
>>> not the publisher.
>>     Which value(s) do you believe should be put into the "INSTITUTION"
>> field of a BIB entry for an RFC ?  :-)
> Not all fields need to be populated. I'd like to suggest:
> 	editor		ISOC
> 	institution	IETF			non indep-stream
> 			authors' insitution(s)	indep stream
> Joe
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> iEYEARECAAYFAkqYAGgACgkQE5f5cImnZrsQVgCgk3Ni8cbu3kVwTpo2qIZPXB84
> Zh4AnRlu9tM+7fe2u+eD/tr1wJOZkJRR
> =rNUP
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
> http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list