[rfc-i] draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-06 : overlooked details?
touch at ISI.EDU
Wed Aug 26 10:46:40 PDT 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Bob Braden wrote:
>> It might be useful to have an "ISOC hold" (as is being done now for the
>> independent stream until legal issues are resolved) and "IESG hold"
>> state separate from AUTH.
> We have (briefly ) considered adding both states, but at this point in
> time it is not worth the effort.
Then the state ought to be denoted as "HOLD". The current state
misrepresents the reason for the hold when the queue is examined and
when statistics are reported ;-)
>> *I* am not the one who held my document for the past 9 months...
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the rfc-interest