[rfc-i] draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-06 : overlooked details?

Joe Touch touch at ISI.EDU
Wed Aug 26 10:20:21 PDT 2009


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Bob Braden wrote:
> 
> John C Klensin wrote:
>> --On Sunday, February 01, 2009 9:01 +0100 Olaf Kolkman
> 
>> That model has some additional side-effects.  For example, there
>> are often attempts to evaluate RFC Editor performance by the
>> length of time that passes while documents sit in the queue.  We
>> sort of know how to adjust those statistics for normative
>> reference holds, but I don't know when to start counting for a
>> document for which the IAB says "put this in the queue but don't
>> publish it until we tell you to".
> 
> John,
> 
> Thanks for caring, but the RFC Editor is experienced at protecting our 
> statistics. ;-(  We have an AUTH [hold] state that works very nicely for 
> such cases.

It might be useful to have an "ISOC hold" (as is being done now for the
independent stream until legal issues are resolved) and "IESG hold"
state separate from AUTH.

*I* am not the one who held my document for the past 9 months...

Joe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkqVbtUACgkQE5f5cImnZrtarACgsouuNNphNGiUui9h4YILgfbV
Z5AAoP5jfSUm1lqhHQze69f0q65ojVuC
=lRZm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list